I.
What is a
political party?
A.
Political party-
trying to gain control over government by running candidates and getting them
elected (an organization that runs candidates for office; it seeks to gain
control over the government)
B.
Interest groups
advocate for a certain issue and try to influence government policy; they
educate people in the process
C.
We have 2 main
parties, but many “3rd Parties” or minor parties
D.
These parties
have changed over the years
E.
Democratic party
has always existed (Was Democratic Republican, then starting with Andrew
Jackson it became the Democratic party)
II.
Why we have a
two party system/ 3rd Parties
A.
Public Opinion
1.
We only have two
major parties because public opinion on key issues is pretty consistent
(economy, governmental system)- we all share a common view and believe in a
certain view of capitalism, democracy, freedom of speech. This concept is
called The American Ideological Consensus, which means that we agree on
ideology. We don’t have the same class
systems- we have social mobility- we have people who could be born into the
working class and become rich. Everyone
is part of the “middle” the two parties try to appeal to these middle people
B.
Our election
system makes it hard for 3rd parties to win
1.
Plurality
voting- the person who gets the most votes wins- this hurts third parties
because if you have a system where you need more than 50% the third party can
use its votes as a bargaining chip, but we don’t have this, so the third
parties have nothing over the bigger parties. In America, no one needs 50%, so
this does nothing for the third parties
2.
Single Member
Districts/Winner Takes all- Only one person wins- this is no true in other
countries, they have proportional representation. You wouldn’t have to win an
election to get seats. In America, plurality wins, and whoever gets the most
votes wins. The biggest most dramatic example of the winner take all is the
electoral college. Only one person wins, we don’t take percentages and carve it
up to divide it all up
III.
Third Parties
A.
Why do these 3rd
parties run in America?
1.
They play the
role of innovator: They force the major parties to adopt certain ideas. They
raise awareness of ideas, or they come up with new ideas. Force other parties
to take clear cut stands on issues. They are a voice for the people that feel
alienated from govt/have ideas that aren't popular. They are a safety valve for
discontent.
B.
FRQ on Minor
parties
1.
The people
voting for the third parties are wasting their votes by voting for them
2.
Winner Take All
System (No proportional System) and Single Member Districts. One is for
president one is for congress. Campaign finance laws hurt minor parties more
than major parties. They are excluded from presidential debate because a person
has to have over a certain percentage of the population to debate. Federal
funding for candidates don’t help them because they don’t have a big enough
percent of the population
3.
Pushes new ideas
and educate people about them, and try to push the major parties to adopts
these ideas
C.
Four Types of
Minor Parties
1.
Ideological
a)
Have lasted the
longest
b)
Want to make big
changes
c)
Socialist,
Communist, Green, Libertarian
2.
Single Issue
Political Parties
a)
Bring up new
ideas and issues
b)
Focus on one
issue, and often times the issue is brand new
c)
Prohibition
Party, Marijuana Party
3.
Economic Protest
Parties
a)
Want to move the
economy in a different direction
b)
Usually based on
region
c)
Populist party
4.
Factional
parties
a)
Breakoff from
one of the 2 major parties
b)
1948 2 different
parties broke off from the Democratic party (one broke of for states rights,
the other was a progressive organization that wanted change and wanted more
radical changes)
2/28/12
IV.
Realignment
Elections
A.
A period of time
when one party gains control of the government and solidifies that control for
a long period of time. It operates under
unified government, because you need control of Congress and the President to
change the direction of the country both socially and economically
1.
Some argue that
Reagan’s election in 1980 was a realigning election, but he never had control
over the House. There was still divided
government, and the Republicans did not control the presidency and
Congress. Reagan still moved the country
in a conservative direction, and many people moved to vote in Reagan’s
direction (Reagan Democrats)
B.
Five
Realignments
1.
1800- Jefferson
became president and the Democratic-Republicans defeated the Federalists and
took over, and there was a peacefully transfer of power
2.
1828- Jackson
became president. There was a shift in
support because there were no more property restrictions on voting, so the
common people voted for Jackson who advocated for the common man. This election put the Democrats on course to
become a major party
3.
1860- Whig Party
collapsed and Republicans came to power with Lincoln. The two parties (Democrats and Whigs) were
struggled over the issue of slavery- neither party addressed the issue
directly, so the Republicans (who were a 3rd party at the time) came
to power because they had a clear view on slavery. It was an issue that led to realignment
(slavery).
4.
1896-
Republicans defeated William Jennings Bryan.
The Populist Party supported suffering farmers and broke off from the
Democrats. Bryan got the Democratic
nomination and adopted the Populist platform, and the Republicans won because
the Democrats who were against the Populists voted for the Republican candidate
(key issue- economics). The country was
not divided between the North and South, now it was East vs. West (urban vs.
rural).
5.
1932- FDR and
the New Deal. Before this most blacks
were Republicans, and FDR brought them into the Democratic Party. FDR got everyone in his coalition- blacks,
Jews, minorities. He took the government
in a totally different direction with social programs and protecting the lower
classes. (key issue- Great Depression
and a new role for government playing a bigger role in our lives)
C.
Lanahan- Was
2008 a realignment election?
1.
No
a)
More Democrats
turned out than Republicans. Democrats
were more enthusiastic about Obama, while Republicans weren’t enthusiastic
about McCain and Palin. This represents
a lack of enthusiasm, but not a shift form one party to another
b)
Enthusiasm for
the Democratic party was not based on ideas, it could have just been a one time
thing because people like Obama’s personality
c)
People were not
thinking about foreign policy as much (Republican strength) and were more
focused on the economy, so they looked toward a Democrat. Hypothetically, if there was a national security
crisis, people may support a Republican candidate
d)
In hindsight
(not in Lanahan)
(1)
We don’t have
unified government anymore- Republicans took control of the House
(2)
Tea Party Movement
2.
Yes
a)
The white
population is going down and the Hispanic population is going up, and Republicans
don’t do well with minorities. Proportionally
fewer white people voted in 2008, which signifies a long term trend of the
decline in whites
b)
Young voters
voted for Obama and can be lifelong Democrats
c)
Shift in
attitude- we now believe in an activist government, which fits in to the
ideology of the Democrats
3.
It’s too early
to tell whether 2008 was a realigning election or not
V.
Learn on your
own- political machines and differences between political parties in US and
Europe
VI.
No comments:
Post a Comment